Oakland Police Video Beating Purported Iraq War Vet

I’ll keep this one short and let the video do the talking.  On my usual trip to The Guardian’s website I found the video that purportedly shows the Oakland police and their response to one Occupy protester.  It is believed that the person in the video may be Iraq War vet Kayvan Sabehgi.  The video was taken by fellow protester Neil Rivas on November 2 (who vouches that this is Kayvan) and shows a very non-aggressive protester with hands in pocket and walking backwards.

Here is the link to the Guardian’s video.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/video/2011/nov/18/occupy-oakland-veteran-beaten-police-video

Leave a Comment

Filed under Politics

A Heapin Helpin of Texas Politics

I like to think that I know a little bit about Texas. Oh, it’s not that I am a Texan. Nor have I studied their culture in any great depth. Anything so academic would not provide a meaningful glimpse into the Texas psyche.  In reality, I lived there for a few months while I was in basic training and tech school for the Air Force.  I was their neighbor while living in the Ark-La-Tex region (Shreveport, LA) for five years.  I was surrounded by Texas natives for ten years in the military (there’s an abnormal amount of them in the Air Force).  So I can say that, though I never lived there for any meaningful length of time, I nonetheless got to know them a bit.

In that time I learned that they have the best cities. Just ask any Texan if you doubt this. They have the best beaches (sorry Florida, California, Hawaii, Barbados, and Cancun – again if you doubt this, just ask them – they’ll swear that their beaches trump all). They have the best music (with apologies given to New Orleans Jazz, Memphis Blues; etc).  They are rich in resources.  There women are the finest, and the biggest coiffed, in America.  Their food is the greatest.  Any Texan will swear that a Santa Barbara Tri-Tip is like Spam in comparison to a Texas brisket.  If you really want to get them going, simply tell them you prefer North Carolina BBQ or a Memphis Rub to anything a Texas grill can put out!  And lest we forget, they are perhaps best known for saving America again and again from our own errant ways by providing us with a veritable swarm of politicians raised in a unique cauldron of plain speaking, up by their own bootstrap swagger, and with a little dash (alright a whole dump truck full) of pomade.

Yes!  They have given us such luminaries as the Bush family.  Who could forget the quiet genius of George, George, and Jeb?  Now some of you might protest that this family actually came from Connecticut, but the fact remains that the Texas gene seeped in and remains there today.  This is also the same state that gave us Lyndon B Johnson!  You remember, don’t you?

“We are not about to send American boys nine or ten thousand miles away from home to do what Asian boys ought to be doing for themselves.”  - 1964

There’s some of that Texas plain talk for you.

Of course, not being satisfied with this for their legacy, Texas has now given us Rick Perry and his smooth tongued ways that could only be rivaled by Porky Pig.  In the meantime, State Representative Larry Taylor has now come out to remind us all about what not to say in front of a live mic!  Of course, in his defense, he may very well have had a moment where he simply wanted to illustrate to the rest of us what might be considered a “bad term” as he called it immediately afterward.  I suppose it is possible that he just picked the exact wrong time for this educational moment.

Indeed, the stars at night are big and bright…deep in the heart of Texas!…and so are their politicians’ mouths, and their hair.

So it is with the Texas political class in mind that I address this solution.  You have so often reminded us of the legality of secession, particularly in your case. We have considered it long and hard, and we promise not to fight you if you want to go ahead and become your own nation.  All we ask is that you immediately take your politicians with you and that you divide up with the rest of our 49 states the capital that has been invested into creating NASA, the Department of Defense and all the military bases that are currently in your state, as well as the funding for roads and other infrastructure; etc. all miscellaneous funds that have gone to you over the past fifty years.  In return we will faithfully extradite any Texas politician after a 30 day eviction notice has been issued.  You may take your vast wealth and your vapid politicians with you, and we will live as a true, modern family does…away from each other and in different countries.

This is perhaps the best option available at a time when you seem intent on flooding the rest of the United States with politicians that either drift into incoherent drivel or are guilty of racial slurs.  As your great state does not seem to be too concerned about these issues, as long as you secede, and make it quick, we promise not to “mess with you.”

Leave a Comment

Filed under Politics

A Modern Proposal

In today’s day and age, with the modern economic woes of Americans seen nightly on the news, it excites the passions of many a young man in New York to begin their own “American Autumn.” In such a case where we find a large portion of the elderly scrambling for jobs with no prospect of a promised retirement because they put their trust in the Wall Street 401K system while the youth are overly educated for their new roles as short order cooks at the local drive-thru, it is a melancholy site that would not fail to excite the pity of many of America’s more affluent citizens.

It is a quietly accepted point that many in our nation, and even our world are quickly degenerating to a state that is a deplorable condition. While children in foreign lands toil and moil for pennies on the U.S. dollar, even the American citizen is not immune. Daily, each American is able to buy less and less with their paychecks and are found to be begging the corporate owners for any pay raise that they can get, just so they can afford food for their families and heat for the winter. It is a slippery slope indeed that we have come across and few have been able to provide an equitable solution that allows the corporate boss to keep his lawfully earned money, the bank to continue lending so that the poor may get a leg up, and the politician an opportunity to continue selflessly legislating for the good of all concerned (particularly the corporations and banks). Many have enjoined the common American to embrace the idea that the Grand Republic’s great experiment of a government for the people and by the people is a failed one and that we should look toward Socialism as our next system. This is urged while other Americans, particularly those of the Tea Party, are very fond of the ancient documents and would surely raise a revolt against anyone that would attempt to deny them their cherished images of Franklin, Jefferson, and Washington. Others have offered that we “stay the course” and “continue to go out, make our purchases, and help the economy back on its feet” as though more debt is the answer to getting us out of our debt. The common response to this point is less than accommodating as most can’t afford to do their part in helping Walmart or Chase Bank back on their feet when they have children that need nourishment.

As for my own thoughts on the subject, having revolved the problem around in my brain for many years now and deliberately considering all of the manifold crises that our country currently finds itself in, I have found the answers of the political parties and revolutionaries to be untenable and lacking in making all parties happy. It is true that Socialism might begin to answer the inequality of our people, yet it would not do for the money makers of our nation. It is true that capitalism would answer for the bankers and the politicians but a grand political ideal cannot feed the starving or give medicine to the elderly.

I have been fortunate enough to hit upon an answer to our dilemma that will answer both sides equally. The poor shall be provided for, the top ten percent of our nation shall be able to continue to hold the lion’s share of wealth and may continue to provide this money to our politicians and banks, while the great history of our nation will not be rewritten one iota from its original purpose. At the time of writing this proposal, the number of American stands at 312,434,046 according to the U.S. Census Bureau. According to the Huffington Post, a national news source of impeccable reliability that has shown over and over again its lack of bias, equal only to CNN, Fox News, and the Drudge Report for its accuracy, the top ten percent of wealthiest Americans held 71.5% of the wealth in our nation as of 2001 while the bottom 60% held 4.2% of the nation’s wealth. (Strachan) Considering the expenses that are taken into account for the wealthy when they create jobs for the common man, begin new factories in foreign nations that employ questionable labor practices, and further must provide for the health benefits of individuals that spend much of their time playing Solitaire or spending time on Facebook during their eight hour work day, and further taking into account the necessary accommodations of a prized pet with pedigree, separate traveling arrangements, and grooming needs for a poodle, we find that the average billionaire, or even millionaire struggling to become a billionaire, is in a tight situation indeed. When you compound this with the necessary expenses of employing illegal aliens in the upkeep of their estate, than their plight becomes one that any American could not abide without shedding a tear.

We have watched while China’s golden star has risen due to their disregard of common Western ideals on what constitutes a reasonable salary or acceptable living conditions. They have proven to the world that the lower ninety percent of a nation’s citizenry are willing to accept a much lower quality of life than we have previously supposed as long as they are assured a bare minimum of food and shelter. Indeed, in other nations within Africa that are now willingly selling themselves into slavery for a chance to produce on behalf of China or pick cocoa for corporations like Nestle, we also find the the lower ninety percent can survive on even less. It is even estimated by the U.S. State Department that as many as 12.3 million adults and children currently hold this status.

It is with this in mind that I propose that America return to its roots immediately by re-instituting slavery on a mass scale. I do not mean to confuse chattel slavery with economic slavery for, if we are to simply use economic slavery than we shall not be much better off than we are now. We live in a world of limited resources that most rightly belong to the top ten percent that are smart enough to ensure its concentration. Economic slavery cannot provide for the current amount of people in this nation that have not availed themselves of grants, loans, or government subsidies that would allow them to rise out of their poverty, having a chance to pursue a degree and thereby move up the economic ladder. If they have availed themselves of such an opportunity, more often than not it has been to pursue a degree in a community college for such lackluster degrees as paralegal, medical assistant, or much worse, using up four years of expenses to immerse themselves in the Humanities such as English. Such individuals come out none the wiser, making a bare minimum for skills that are either thoroughly useless to modern corporations, or are such low paying positions as to ensure that they will continue to burden Wall Street with their protests. Many of these vain pursuits of the bottom 90 percent (some even call it the lower 99 percent) can be either outright eliminated (such as English) or can be taught through on the job training through other slaves.

By re-instituting chattel slavery, we are no longer burdened with the horrific images of the homeless on street corners asking for a handout or the elderly asking for appropriate medicines to alleviate their ailments. The lower ninety percent may no longer complain for lack of housing or food. It will be provided for by the benevolent top ten percent, just as Socialism asks. They will further not be bothered by images of Karl Marx as they can proudly retain the original Constitution. Not only does this provide for the common American citizen and bring us back to our original Constitution, it will have the added benefit of more directly controlling the population of our nation while ensuring a better outcome for political elections. As the original intent of slavery will be brought back, the slave may no longer vote or have any say over how many children they are allowed to have. Over the time of a few generations we may thus reduce our population to a more sustainable level while ensuring that the status quo stays in effect.

Some may complain that such a proposal would not work as the common slave would be treated like an animal. I respond to such criticism by asking the protester of such a plan to speak to the common day laborer and ask them how they are currently treated. It may also be said that it would remove the hope of a better future for the slave. What hope does he now have when he has spent the first eighteen years of his life in schooling, continuing on for another six to eight more in order to earn a Masters degree so that he may be hopelessly in debt and employed in the same manner as the day laborer?

Discounting such vain objections, the bonuses to such a system are manifold. American jobs would once again go to Americans. The crippling effects of poverty would be reduced or eliminated as each person in the lower ninety percent would be taken care of by a master whose best interest would be to ensure that each slave is treated well so as to get the most out of this human resource. The housewives of such glorious American areas as Orange County, New Jersey, and New York, could spend their idle time and their affections in dressing up the house slaves and treating the brightest and the most attractive to a level of refinement that they could never hope to achieve in this current economic system. Just as the modern billionaire’s poodle is left millions in a will, an especially good slave could eventually earn their freedom with a large stipend besides to last them the rest of their lives. Such an incentive would surely cause them to labor to the great benefit of their master.

With such enticements to adopt this system I can see no reason why it should not be started immediately. Therefore, let no man raise an objection to such a system unless he is willing to first offer up an equitable plan that will allow for a reasonable amount of food, shelter, and a degree of hope for each person involved.

As for my own part in this solution, I am tired of seeing the dissolution of the American Dream dredged through the nightly news over my meal. Despairing for my nation, I decided upon this course as one that would benefit all without having to worry about changing how men are currently treated.

I offer this plan, not out of any material benefit for my own person, but rather through the eyes of a true patriot of our nation. I do not hope to gain my own plantation or manufacturing plant by this offer, but would rather simply be happy to see so many millionss of people with hope once again in their daily life; and that being more hope than any politician can promise at this point.

Leave a Comment

Filed under philosophy, Politics

The Game

This world
Pounds
Vibrates
Pulsates
with tightly compacted hate

Each person
anxious to get
more
- more
- More
as the money machine
drives the whole
Damned
show.

Watch out Mr
GoGetter,
Mr RabbitChaser,
single handedly keeping
the whole
game going.

We’re on to you
and your sham.
The way you
destroy men’s souls
to earn your daily bread
- lost in the game
that your,
Daddy Started.

Never stopping
- ONCE -
to ask.
Why?

Leave a Comment

Filed under Writing

2010

Living off the table scraps
of a dying empire.
Content to hear the voices
now thirty years gone.

Where are the passions of today?
The poets,
musicians,
writers
- the Jack Kerouacs
Hunter Thompsons
now bound to contracts
with the big companies
churning out culture.

So -
2010.
Living like a vulture
on the rotting carrion
of the twentieth century,
too concerned with a
401K and
reality TV
to live.
Really LIVE!

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The Responsibilities of the Reader vs the Writer

My last post brought up the discussion of what the responsibilities of the writer are to the reader and oddly enough (and in a completely unrelated book) I ran across the opposite viewpoint and it got me thinking. Yesterday’s viewpoint was unapologetically writer centric and took the point of the grand artist that will let his work stand on it’s own whether it’s understood or not. Mark Harris’ view is one that states “I have written it and now it is your turn to understand it!” The viewpoint that I ran across today? Well…slightly different…
“Often I think we let the writer get away with too much. If the writing is unclear, we’ll read it a second time and make it clear to ourselves and then let the writer off the hook, when, in fact, the writing has to stand for itself…”
Wally Lamb (Novelist) quoted in “Writing Fiction” by Burroway, Stuckey-French; et al (and yes I know it’s bad form to quote a quote)

So the obvious next question is this…who’s right? You have one that has said it’s the writer and one that has said it’s the reader that needs to “grow ears” (Mark Harris’ idea). I suppose I hope that anything I write would stand on it’s own, perhaps not to all persons, but to many or at least those I hope to reach. I am not naive enough to expect that my words being thrown carelessly into the void of the internet would return with a large fan base that suddenly “gets it” enough that I might change the status quo (because as well know…the status is not…quo).  I do at least hope, however, that at least a few people will understand it enough to think a bit on it.  I write so that I might understand others and be understood by others.  Would we expect the painter to be beside the painting at all points in order to explain?   Do we expect the writer to stand beside each book and explain?  If it’s not sufficiently clear to the reader at what point does that become the writer’s responsibility?  I am certainly not in the same world, universe, or even dimension of T.S. Eliot but it seems to me that he is misunderstood by many more than he is understood.  Does this invalidate his work?  So who’s responsibility is it then?  If anyone has any good answers I’d love to hear about it!

Leave a Comment

Filed under Writing

on writing

“I will talk baby talk to babies and dog talk to dogs, but I cannot tell you in baby talk or dog talk of the excitement of being an adult human being in a world so wonderous with hope and sorrow and loyalty and defeat and anguish and delight.”
- Mark Harris “Easy Does It Not” from The Living Novel

This was written in relation to the question on whether or not an author should be so responsible to explain everything to the reader or not.  I am blown away by the idea.  In a world so overly bloated with the idea of dumbing it down for the lowest common denominator shouldn’t we instead choose to write in order to help elevate mankind?

Leave a Comment

Filed under Writing

Granny’s Blanket

Every little boy should have a

Granny’s Blanket.

Made from the dresses

she wore in the kitchen

on a warm summer’s day

with the house smellin’ like

- fresh potato peelings,

- hot creamed squash

and a rabbit on the stove

thanks to Grandaddy’s strong,

time whittled hands.

 

Every little boy should have a

Granny’s Blanket -

of the dresses Granny wore

when she sat in the living room,

watching two merrily oblivious

grandchildren prancing around,

and begging for a tall glass of

Granny’s sweet tea.

 

Every little boy should have a

Granny’s Blanket.

Made by a quiet mother,

with each tattered dress

stitched together

to keep a little boy warm

- when the December fever strikes.

- To bury down in and close his eyes

and hear Grandaddy’s supper prayer

playing back in the fondest memories

of a Virginia Blue Ridge Mountain summer

- with wild blackberry juice

staining the whole Americana scene

a rich violet hue,

- like some holy Renaissance church

as the sun pours past the

bifurcated colours of the windows

telling the story

 

Of how Uncle John was chased

round the barn for breaking the 3rd commandment.

How the littlest girl,

Daddy’s piano playing angel

was born on the farm in the

middle of a February blizzard.

How the oldest boy ran off to fight the German evil,

coming back with a Purple Heart

and silent nightmares for the rest of his days -

and all of the Old South stories

full of soldiers,

preachers,

and farmers.

 

Every little boy should have a

Granny’s Blanket

to remind him

when he’s so far from home

- of those beautiful times

when innocence was taken for granted.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Writing

The Living Novel

I am currently reading an old book by the name of “The Living Novel” that I had to hunt down via private sellers on amazon to find a copy. I cant deny that there is a certain relish that I have for this digital version of ye olde book shoppe hunting but it does make me wish that there was still a place to walk into in which I could find an elderly matron that knows about all things printed and can track down a copy of some bit of obscurity I have been looking for.
To the point, however…
This book, a collection of essays by famous authors and a very good collection at that, has really caused me to rethink my own writing (particularly in conjunction with my current creative writing class that I’m taking in college). One however, really got me thinking.
Herbert Gold’s essay on The Mystery of Personality in the Novel is one that I’m particularly fascinated with. He discusses the writer’s personality and how it bleeds over into what he chooses to write and how it is best or worst for society.

I wanted to write about it because he goes into detail on Plato’s Cave and how some authors use this as a comfortable archetype for writing about larger ideals.  I think this is something that I do as well however I don’t share his opinion that this is all such a bad thing.  Ideals are to me exactly what the aspiring writer should choose to discuss in his works.  Does this mean that his work needs to be some self pandering lecture on morality?  Of course not!  However, how do you escape your own philosophy as an artist or a writer?  You can’t.  Tolkien and CS Lewis both reveled in their faith throughout their books.  One of the greatest books (The Divine Comedy) is very much about this.  I see no reason why an author should do his best to be objective when objectivity is not really the whole point of art.

So why do I write?  I write because I have to (which is the cliche after all, isn’t it?).  Honestly I write because I have an ego and I think I can teach the world a thing or two.  That’s the REAL reason why people write.  Perhaps some may write because they have a burning desire to attain to the mantle itself, however I’d say that most writers write for the same reason that I do; we’re not satisfied with the simple power of being a political leader but would prefer to be the influencer of all humanity!  We’re a vain lot that gives into self-loathing and pessimism (quite a contrast).  We also want to shine a mirror on the world and, as for me…well I simply want to know the world and to be understood by the world.  I want to stand naked before all of humanity and embrace it.  I want to understand the flaws of the world and say, as Salieri said “I absolve you” because I am one of you and am your product.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Writing

A Final Arbiter

I’ve been puzzled by this one for sometime, though I believe that if anyone were to look at my blog for more than a few passing seconds (the average attention span of the post-MTV world) they would know where I stand with this question.

Is it possible for man to live a moral life if morality is dictated solely by man? Assuming for a moment that the naturalist ideal is correct in the assertion that there is no such thing as a miracle and if anything is explained by the use of “the miraculous” it must be thrown out, than where do we go for our wisdom, our morality, or ideals of both right and wrong? In short, who is our final arbiter?

I don’t mean this to be a set-up to anyone that may view life differently from me. Nor am I attempting to bait someone into a GOTCHA! Christian debate. I’m sincerely curious about thoughts on this one as it is this subject that has continually lead my reasoning back to not only theism, but Christian theism at that.

All civil comments are welcome and appreciated. :)

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized